Condoleezza Rice is upset over Richard Clarke's testimony before the 9-11 commission that she severely underestimated the threat of Al-Qaeda during the first eight months of the Bush administration. Although she now wants to meet again with the commission to explain the intelligence failures that preceded the 9-11 attacks, Dr. Rice will only meet with the commissioners in private -- and not under oath.
If Dr. Rice will be discussing sensitive national security issues, a private session with the commission obviously makes sense. But I cannot think of any legitimate reason why president Bush's National Security Advisor refuses to take an oath to tell the 9-11 commission "the truth, and nothing but the truth."
Friday, March 26, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(398)
-
▼
March
(14)
- Hey Kids -- Comments!
- Et tu, NPR?
- The Truth, and Nothing But
- WMDs are not a joke to G.I.s
- "Out of the Loop" = "Ignored"
- Character is Important
- The most crooked, lying group I've ever seen
- Jack and Jeri Ryan
- Flip Flop
- Sanctity of Neil Bush's Marriage
- Heroes as Props
- Long-Term Joblessness
- Bush 9-11 Ad Hypocrisy
- Alan Greenspan: Reverse Robin Hood
-
▼
March
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment