Christine Cegelis, a software engineer, picked up 44 percent of the vote against Hyde in 2004.Holding Hyde to the lowest percent of the vote in decades.
She's running again.Actually, Christine never stopped running. Christine has been out and about in the 6th District, meeting with her neighbors, getting to know their concerns about the direction in which our country is headed. Since 2004, she has been building on the grass-roots network of supporters who pulled in 44% of the vote without any support from Washington.
But Democrats have a better candidate in Tammy Duckworth, a veteran of the Iraq war who has fresh and pragmatic views on trade, health care, taxes and other issues.And what criteria does the Tribune editorial board use to determine what views are "fresh and pragmatic"?
Let's ask Don Wycliff, the Trib's Public Editor:
[T]he editorial board is guided in making its decisions by what might be called the "Tribune manifesto," a statement of philosophical principles and attitudes. Based on a 1969 editorial that marked a change of administration--nay, a change of era--at the newspaper ***. One exemplary paragraph:So the Tribune, whose editorial page is still considered generally conservative, bases its endorsements on a "manifesto" formulated back when the paper was even more conservative. Are we to believe that the Tribune manifesto reflects the views of Democrats in the 6th District?The Tribune believes in the traditional principles of limited government; maximum individual responsibility; and minimum restriction of personal liberty, opportunity and enterprise. It believes in free markets, free will and freedom of expression.
These principles, while traditionally conservative, are guidelines and not reflexive dogmas.
Back to the Tribune's analysis of the Emanual candidate:
She has some well-considered views on how the U.S. and Iraqis can finish the job there and bring American soldiers home.And just what does the Tribune see as "well-considered views" when it comes to Iraq?
Well, let's take a look at the "well-considered views" of the man the Chicago Tribune endorsed for president in 2004:
Bush arguably invaded with too few allies and not enough troops. He will go to his tomb defending his reliance on intelligence from agencies around the globe that turned out to be wrong. And he has refused to admit any errors.But, nevertheless, the Tribune endorsed George W. Bush.
The Tribune endorsed the candidate who "arguably" invaded with too few troops and not enough allies...
and insufficient armor for our troops...
and no plan for reconstruction...
and a self-evident inability to protect Iraq's "democracy" from a sectarian civil war...
and who still -- STILL -- has refused to admit any errors.
You know, it's almost enough to call into question the Tribune's judgment when it comes to candidates and their views on Iraq.
And how did the Tribune cap off that regrettable endorsement from the fall of 2004:
For three years, Bush has kept Americans, and their government, focused -- effectively -- on this nation's security. The experience, dating from Sept. 11, 2001, has readied him for the next four years, a period that could prove as pivotal in this nation's history as were the four years of World War II.And since then we have seen how "effectively" the Tribune's "readied" candidate bungled the aftermath of the Katrina disaster.
We have seen how "effectively" the Tribune's candidate has let Iraq descend into chaos.
We have seen how "effectively" the Tribune's candidate has turned our nation's ports over to the royal families of the United Arab Emirates -- one of only three countries in the world to recognize the Taliban government that protected Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda.
Nice call, Tribune.
And, if nothing else, 6th District Democrats should ask one question when contemplating the value of the Tribune's endorsement in the Democratic primary: Who did the Chicago Tribune endorse in the 6th District in 2004?
The Tribune's endorsement history gives us a clear record of the Trib's philosophical principles and attitudes.
Now 6th District Democrats have to decide which candidate best represents them and their philosophical principles and attitudes.